Managing Our Prejudices Within Our Own Families
September 11, 2009 by Susan
Filed under Children, Conflict Resolution, Diversity, Family, Generations
Most of us don’t think of having biases against our own sons and daughters, but, sometimes, because emotions do run high in a family, that’s exactly what they are.
Preston, my youngest son, never cared much about traditional school learning. School gave him a chance to sharpen his skills in ditching, fibbing and faking.
When I was a kid growing up in a Chicago working class neighborhood, education was king. From day one, I heard, “You’re going to college. You are going to college.” My parents expected that my brother and I would be on the honor roll. It was more than a family goal; it was a community-wide aspiration since many of the adults in my neighborhood had barely finished high school. We were going to be the first generation to go on to higher education.
When I became a mother, it did not matter that I had adopted my sons. In my mind, my sons were O’Hallorans and that meant… the honor roll and college.
However, when my son, Preston, hit junior high and switched from a pass/fail to a letter-grade system, he continually brought home Ds and Cs. My husband and I responded by mounting a campaign that made several modern wars look like small potatoes. My kitchen walls and several file drawers were filled with charts and formulas such as: “Skip class, trade in two desserts,” or “This many completed assignments equals this many minutes of TV-watching.” Anything to get my son motivated!
Then, one day, I had the good fortune to read some of Howard Gardener’s writing. The educator and author Howard Gardener talks in several of his books about multiple intelligences. He points out that our present-day school system only promotes and rewards two kinds: verbal and logic/math intelligence. There are five others: spatial, musical, kinetic, interpersonal (having people smarts) and intra-personal (being self-reflective or smart about yourself).
My son has several of these non-school intelligences. For example, he has spatial intelligence. If you are going camping, have Preston pack your car. You won’t need rooftop storage; Preston will get everything you need neatly stuffed into your car. Of course, you’ll have to take him along to repack your car or, upon your return, you’ll be forced to leave half your gear behind.
Preston also plays the guitar – musical intelligence – draws hilarious cartoons – visual intelligence – picks up dance steps quickly – kinetic intelligence – and is the one in our house who knew what was going on with everyone else – interpersonal smarts.
Slowly, with Mr. Gardener’s help, the charts and formulas came off the walls. Finally, we caught our breath and asked, “What strengths can we support rather than continually focusing on what’s not working?” At last, we looked at this kid of ours and said, “Who are you?”
Soon after this revelation, we found ourselves in the chauffeuring business, trying to support Preston’s more natural, outside school talents: soccer, Art Institute lessons and so on. We cut a deal with Preston. “Okay, get C’s and we’ll get off your back. C’s will still keep a few doors open. Maybe someday you’ll decide college is for you.”
I’m still waiting. Today, Preston lives in Alaska working as the head mechanic at a cannery. He loves working outdoors, climbing under trucks or crawling up huge cranes that lift commercial fishing boats out of the water. As long as he’s operating heavy machinery, he’s a happy man.
I say to myself several times a week, “He’s happy. He’s happy. He’s happy.” But the truth is that every time I see an article that connects years of college with increased earnings, I have to bite my hand to keep from clipping out the article and sending it up north.
I still wish my son had gone to college. I think he would be more economically secure if he had. I cannot get that thought out of my mind, even though it defies reason and experience – we’ve all heard the stories of entrepreneurs who became millionaires without finishing high school. But no matter how progressive I might think I am, I have an emotional commitment to my prejudice. The mantra, “You will go to college. You will go to college,” was repeated in my family with such worry, angst and joyous expectation, I soaked it in. “You will go to college” is written in my DNA.
I cannot eliminate my bias in favor of formal education. I can, however, manage it before I treat my son in a condescending, controlling manner. My children know my opinions on higher education. That’s part of my job as a parent; I have given them guidance. Then, I let go. They’re adults; it’s time for them to live their own lives. I hate that, but it’s true. So I bug out.
All of us have prejudices. The question is: what do we want to do with them? In being aware of and managing my bias, I have the prejudice; it doesn’t have me. Each time I was able to admit that I had a prejudice against one of my sons’ qualities or behaviors, my parenting improved. Only then did I have a choice as to how I would behave rather than responding with unconscious, automatic, less than kind reactions.
Within the larger family of human beings with which we share this earth, the dynamic is much the same: become aware of and manage our prejudices and we can all live more freely and happily together.
This article may be reprinted when this full byline is used:
Susan O’Halloran is a story artist, workshop presenter, television personality and keynote speaker whose work explores the complex issues of social justice. She is an author of four books plus diversity curriculums, CDs and films. The Chicago Reader says O’Halloran “has mastered the Irish art of telling stories that are funny and heart-wrenching at the same time.” For a copy of a free teleseminar with Susan, go to www.susanohalloran.com
* Photo purchased from istockphoto.com
Moving from PC (Politically Correct) to PC (Personally Caring) Language
Language is never neutral. I am a professional story artist and I have witnessed again and again storytellers, teachers, ministers and librarians, with the best of intentions, telling their audiences stories about slavery. They are trying to right a wrong; they know we were never taught the cruel realities of that economic system. However, throughout the telling they continuously use the word “slave.” The word “slave” certainly seems like a neutral word describing a specific reality. But several years ago some African American tellers pointed out to me that a word such as “slave” denotes a certain viewpoint, the oppressor’s viewpoint. It reduces people to a de-humanized role. Instead, when we use words such as “people who were enslaved’, or “people who were kidnapped” or “people who were held captive,” we get an accurate description of who were the doers and who were the done-tos.
I’m not talking about choosing our words to be “politically correct,” but to become more aware of what we are communicating – intentionally and unintentionally. This debate over language isn’t arbitrary or frivolous. One group has had the power to name things, has had the power for so long that we are blind to the biases and put downs associated with so many “common” words. The greatest sign of respect is to call people what they want to be called.
I know this can seem confusing. But make it simple: ask the people you are involved with or plan to tell stories about what they prefer to be called. Not in a manner that puts them under a microscope or asks them to speak for their group such as: “What do “you all” want to be called?” (“Well, all twelve million of us have taken a vote and…”) Instead, ask people as individuals what they prefer and be ready to share your preferences as well. This means we have to make contact; this means we have to talk to each other.
Instead of feeling put out by the need to consider language, we could rejoice in the fact that we’re finally becoming a multi-voiced nation. People are beginning to name themselves and no one group of anything wants to be called any one thing.
Language is a living, breathing, ever-changing art form. We could take the attitude that it’s interesting and even fun to play with words to get descriptions that are more clear, more accurate and more sensitive. We take the time not to be “right” but because we care not to hurt each other. When we choose different words we help people see a different reality. A different shared reality is the foundation upon which we can build a transformed society that works for everyone.
This article may be reprinted when this full byline is used:
Susan O’Halloran is a story artist, workshop presenter, television personality and keynote speaker whose work explores the complex issues of social justice. She is an author of four books plus diversity curriculums, CDs and films. The Chicago Reader says O’Halloran “has mastered the Irish art of telling stories that are funny and heart-wrenching at the same time.” For a copy of a free teleseminar with Susan, go to www.susanohalloran.com
* Photo purchased from istockphoto.com
